Question & Thought for September 26th, 2015!!!

Good Saturday Morning!
1. Question – Is reading for girls?
2. Thought – You could do a whole books on just the issue of males and computers in our culture, so there isn’t enough space to do justice to it here, but this is a book on reading and we have a serious male/boy problem there. The international study of fifteen-year-olds in 2000 showed male readers finishing significantly behind their female peers in all 32 nations. Along with the sports culture factor I noted in the introduction, other factors may be at work, including the fact that at-risk boys often come from families where there isn’t an adult male at home or that male does not read to the child or in front of him. Couple with the fact that most elementary teachers and librarians are female, the question arises whether boys perceive early on that “reading is for girls.” (The Read-Aloud Handbook by Jim Trelease)

 

He said to him, “What is written in the law?” How do you read it? (Jesus, from Luke 10:26 ESV)​

 

​platypus​

 – know the why or lose the way! 

Question & Thought & ANDs.

Question & Thought for May 4th, 2015!!!

Good Monday Morning Readers!!!
1. Question – What is the opposite of reading?
2. Thought – Television is the direct opposite of reading. In breaking its programs into 8-minute commercial segments, it requires and fosters a short attention span. Reading, on the other hand, requires and encourages longer attention spans in children. Good children’s books are written to hold children’s attention, not interrupt it. Because of the need to hold viewers until the next commercial message, the content of television shows is almost constant action. Television is relentless; no time is allowed to ponder characters’ thoughts or to recall their words because the dialogue and film move too quickly. The need to scrutinize is a critical need among young children and it is constantly ignored by television. Books, however, encourage a critical reaction; the reader moves at his own pace as opposed to that of the director or sponsor. The reader can stop to ponder the character’s next move, the feathers in his hat, or the meaning of a sentence. Having done so, he can resume where he left off without having missed any part of the story.
The arrival of the remote control is only exacerbating the attention span problem: the average family “zaps” once every 3-minutes, 26-seconds, verses those who have no remote (once every 5-minutes, 15-seconds). (The New Read-Aloud Handbook by Jim Trelease, copyright 1989)

 

​So,
the TV may be a big reason for ADD​, SAT scores dropping, & weak attention spans. 1984 and George Orwell come to mind. And toss in the computer! The book’s copyright is 1989 before the cell phone explosion. Guess what? I often wonder if we were thinking about the consequences of ‘not thinking’ before we did this to ourselves.

 

rem – know the why behind the what! 
Question & Thought & ANDs.