Good Wednesday Morning! [I just gotta wonder how peace and human right activists as well as these authors will vote in the upcoming election. Sometimes – Insanity comes to mind as I see history repeat.]
1. Question – Why didn’t Bill Clinton act during his term as president on the situation in Darfur?
2. Thought – Many of us peace and human rights advocates are rightly reluctant about the use of force. We need to get over it. There is such a thing as evil in the world, and sometimes the only way to confront evil is through the judicious use of military force. As long as the use of force is accountable, multilateral, and focused on stopping the suffering of victims, then we advocates of peace and justice need to be prepared to support the legitimate and discriminate use of force.
Let’s say a normal temperature for any foreign policy issue would be ninety-eight degrees. On Darfur, activists managed to turn the heat up to one hundred degrees, and lots happened, but not enough to immediately stop the genocide. Our goal has to be to develop a committed constituency of American citizens in each congressional district who are willing to dedicate a small portion of their free time to turning the temperature up to 102 degrees, to where the politicians will be unable to ignore their responsibility to protect human life, and the president will be unable to shirk his responsibility to lead the efforts to prevent or confront mass atrocities wherever they are being committed. (NOT ON OUR WATCH, The Mission to End Genocide in Darfur and Beyond by Don Cheadle and John Prendergast)
“I am a Jew who remembers when my people in German-occupied Europe were condemned to isolation, hunger, humiliation, unspeakable terror, and death. until almost the end of the war, nobody came to our rescue.
I am member of the human family who remembers that 800,000 human beings were massacred in Rwanda in 1994. They could of been saved, but nobody came to their rescue.” (Elie Wiesel)
AND:
Trump: Who’s paying for Obama’s political trips?
By Nick Gass
07/05/16 07:41 AM EDT
Donald Trump on Tuesday ratcheted up his criticism of President Barack Obama’s travel aboard Air Force One to help Hillary Clinton, ripping into the president for his campaign trip to North Carolina at taxpayers’ expense.
“Taxpayers are paying a fortune for the use of Air Force One on the campaign trail by President Obama and Crooked Hillary. A total disgrace!” Trump tweeted Tuesday, hours before Clinton and Obama are scheduled to fly from Joint Base Andrews to Charlotte, North Carolina, for their first joint appearance.
Clinton is scheduled to address the National Education Association’s representative assembly Tuesday morning in Washington before the afternoon event.
Trump first raised the question Monday evening, tweeting, “Why is President Obama allowed to use Air Force One on the campaign trail with Crooked Hillary? She is flying with him tomorrow. Who pays?”
As conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch has uncovered, a typical trip aboard Air Force One costs upwards of $200,000 per hour.
But under guidelines first adopted by the Reagan administration in 1982, and formalized by Congress in 2009, Clinton’s campaign — or the Democratic National Committee — would be obligated to reimburse taxpayers for at least some portion of Obama’s North Carolina trip, under a formula at the discretion of the White House.
The costs for some staff involved in such political trips, such as Secret Service agents who accompany the president wherever he goes, are always paid by the government.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/trump-obama-political-trips-225092#ixzz4DZVpbCC7
AND
: Voting on judges is difficult. Two avenues to research: 1) who nominated or placed the judge on the bench will tell you what “party” placed him/her; 2) in our state, we can see data on what lawyers think of or evaluate each judge–favorable or unfavorable. It’s not much, but it’s a starting point.
But you are correct. With activist judges on the bench, the voter now needs to vet each nominee or incumbent….very difficult to do.