Question & 2 Thoughts for June 30th, 2015!!!

Good Morning on the Last Day of June 2015!
1. Question – Was America ever a Christian nation?
2. Thought –
The myth that America is a “Christian nation” is not only untrue, but promotes the pernicious idea that non-Christians are second-class citizens.
June 24, 2012
 

 

“The United States is a Christian nation.” If I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard this statement at a religious Right meeting or in the media, I wouldn’t be rich—but I’d probably have enough to buy a really cool iPad. The assertion is widely believed by followers of the religious Right and often repeated—and, too often, it seeps into the beliefs of the rest of the population as well. But like other myths that are widely accepted (you use only 10 percent of your brain, vitamin C helps you get over a cold, and the like), it lacks a factual basis.

Over the years, numerous scholars, historians, lawyers, and judges have debunked the “Christian nation” myth. Yet it persists. Does it have any basis in American history? Why is the myth so powerful? What psychological need does it fill?

3. Thought – Nor is it surprising to find that Tocqueville argues that what allows liberty and equality to coexist in America is the fact that the conception of liberty the Puritans brought with them to America was a distinctively Christian conception, not mere ‘let alone’ nor a liberty that might turn into a license, but a capacity to conduct ourselves by a law we freely accept. (Alan Ryan from the Introduction of Democracy in America by Alexisde Tocqueville)

“Voter: “I wouldn’t vote for you, if you were St. Peter himself!”
Candidate: “If I were St. Peter, you wouldn’t be in my district!”

rem – know the why behind the what! 
Question & Thought & ANDs.

Question & Thought for June 29th, 2015!

Good Monday Morning!
1. Question – Certain books and documents are considered ‘living.’ Does that mean we can change them as time goes on and cultures change?
2. Thought – Call it constitutionalism. In essence, constitutionalism is the intellectual counterpart and spiritual progeny of the “originalism” movement in jurisprudence. Judicial “originalists” (led by Antonin Scalia and other notable conservative jurists) insist that legal interpretation be bound by the text of the Constitution as understood by those who wrote it and their contemporaries. Originalism has grown to become the major challenger to the “liberal Constitution” school, under which high courts are channelers of the spirit of the age, free to create new constitutional principles accordingly.
What originalism is to jurisprudence, constitutionalism is to governance: a call for restraint in constitutional text. Constitutionalism as a political philosophy represents a reformed, self-regulating conservatism that bases its call for minimalist government – for reining in the willfulness of presidents and legislatures – in the words and meaning of the Constitution. (The Washington Post, January 7, 2011 by Charles Krauthammer in his book Things That Matter)
His reply when Demosthenes was asked about what can be done about the decline of Athens, “I will give what I believe is the fairest and truest answer: Don’t do what you are doing now.”

 

​Good Day!​

 

rem – know the why behind the what! 
Question & Thought & ANDs.

Question & Thought for the last Sunday in June 2015!!!

Good Sunday Morning!!!
1. Question – Are we way too busy to observe the details?
2. Thought – Just one example of how a knowledge of everyday life of the time can help us more fully understand the stories of the Bible can be seen in the account of the arrangements for the Last Supper. As related in the Gospel of Luke, Jesus tells Peter and John to prepare a Passover feast. When they ask him where to prepare it, Jesus replies, “Behold, when you have entered the city, a man carrying a jar of water will meet you; follow him into the house which he enters…” (Luke 22.10). Since the city of Jerusalem was full of Jesus’ enemies, secrecy was necessary. Only if we know that in that time no man would normally be seen carrying a water jar – that was women’s work – can we realized that this was probably a secret, prearranged sign.  Thus, something of the ominous danger surrounding Jesus and his disciples is revealed in a seemingly innocuous detail. It is through such details that we can more fully know the great people of the Bible and how they lived. (Great People of the Bible and how They Lived by Reader’s Digest)
“God loves you just the way you are, but he refuses to leave you that way. He wants you to be…..”

rem – know the why behind the what! 
Question & Thought & ANDs.

Question & Thought June 27th, 2015!!!

Good Saturday Morning!!!
1. Question – Are you the type of person who would teach someone without loving them?
2. Thought – Don’t be quick to answer.
What do you think and feel when you are in a group of people? Are you overly aware of the ones who are wealthy, attractive, or have something they can offer you? Do you worry about what people think of you? Or do you look for ways to love and opportunities to give? A sure sign of a loveless heart is seeing people as a means to your own ends – they listen to you, give you affirmation when you want it, stay out of the way when you don’t, etc. Teaching other people with this type of mentality is bound to be sterile and unfruitful. According to Paul, every time we try to teach someone with this mentality, we can be sure that we have become nothing more than a clanging gong or resounding symbol; we have made ourselves both annoying and irrelevant. (Multiply by francis chan)
“Relationships don’t thrive because the guilty are punished but because the innocent are merciful.” (Max Lucado)

rem – know the why behind the what! 
Question & Thought & ANDs.